Canine osteogenic sarcoma treated by amputation and MER: An adverse effect of splenectomy on survival

13Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Canine and human osteogenic sarcomas, like most other malignant tumors, cause or are associated with progressive impairment of host immune reactivity. Adjuvant immunotherapy with live BCG had shown increased survival in one study of canine disease. Experiments with induced fibrosarcomas in mice had suggested that some of the host immune defect might be ameliorated by splenectomy. A prospective clinical trial was conducted with several cooperating veterinary centers. Dogs with osteosarcoma apparently confined to a limb were randomized to be treated by amputation and methanol‐extracted residue of BCG (MER), or by the same modalities plus splenectomy. Randomization was discontinued relatively early in the study because of higher mortality in the splenectomy group. Animals treated by amputation and MER could be compared only with historic controls; median and one‐year survival rates did not differ significantly from those of prior series. Animals treated by amputation, splenectomy, and MER had significantly poorer survival. Copyright © 1982 American Cancer Society

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meyer, J. A., Dueland, R. T., MacEwen, E. G., Macy, D. W., Hoefle, W. D., Richardson, R. C., … Hause, W. R. (1982). Canine osteogenic sarcoma treated by amputation and MER: An adverse effect of splenectomy on survival. Cancer, 49(8), 1613–1616. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19820415)49:8<1613::AID-CNCR2820490814>3.0.CO;2-R

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free