Network meta-analysis: science or alchemy? – What works best in generalized anxiety disorder?

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recently Papola et al. (2023) published a network meta-analysis (NMA) on psychotherapy of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and concluded that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) should be considered the first-line treatment for GAD. However, there are several concerns with regard to the procedures and the conclusions of this NMA and of NMA in general. We show that these concerns question the conclusions by Papola et al. Furthermore, we place concerns about this NMA in a broader context and question whether existing evidence is consistent with the notion that one form of psychotherapy can be regarded as the gold standard for mental disorders and for all patients and therapists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leichsenring, F., Steinert, C., Luyten, P., & Heim, N. (2024). Network meta-analysis: science or alchemy? – What works best in generalized anxiety disorder? Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie, 70(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2024.70.2.106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free