The Impact of Clinical Follow-Up After Revascularization on the Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia

4Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Guidelines for optimal follow-up for patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization (LER) for peripheral arterial disease recommend multiple visits with imaging during the first year followed by yearly monitoring thereafter. Critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients are at a greater risk for mortality and limb amputation than claudicants and thus necessitate closer monitoring. The goal of this article is to study the effects of compliance with follow-up after revascularization for patients with CLTI on major amputation rates and mortality. Methods: A single-center retrospective chart review of consecutive patients undergoing LER for CLTI was performed. Patients were stratified based on compliance with follow-up to compliant or noncompliant cohorts. Patient characteristics, reinterventions, and perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Results: There were 356 patients undergoing LER and 61% (N = 218) were compliant. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. Noncompliant patients were more likely to undergo endovascular interventions compared to compliant patients (92.8% vs. 79.4%, P = 0.03). There was no difference in perioperative outcomes between the 2 groups with overall 30-day mortality of 0.6%. After mean follow-up of 2.7 years, compliant patients had greater ipsilateral reintervention rates (49.1% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.005) and overall reintervention rates (61% vs. 44.2%, P = 0.002) compared to noncompliant patients. There was no significant difference in mortality or ipsilateral major amputations between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Patients who were compliant with follow-up after LER for CLTI underwent more reinterventions with no difference in mortality or major limb amputation. Further research regarding the threshold for reintervention and the optimal schedule for follow-up in patients with CLTI is needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kiwan, G., Mohamedali, A., Kim, T., Zhuo, H., Zhang, Y., Mena-Hurtado, C., … Ochoa Chaar, C. I. (2022). The Impact of Clinical Follow-Up After Revascularization on the Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 86, 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2022.05.043

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free