The Use of Metaphors With LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY ® For Harmony and Innovation

  • McCusker S
  • Swan J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Organisational changes within Higher Education Institutions (HEI) over recent years have had a great effect on the roles of Higher Education (HE) staff and their attitudes, experience and satisfaction within those roles. The changes in the way HEIs are funded have resulted in institutional policies that are strongly market driven. Alongside this, policies of widening access to HE have led to the 'massification' of student numbers and the intensification of the workload of HE staff. The increasing focus on measures and evaluations between and within institutions, with league tables and in the UK at least, Research Excellence Framework (REF) and its previous incarnations along with the recently introduced Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), has led to a culture of audit and managerialism both at the level of institutional policy and at the micro level within faculties and departments. These effects have been particularly acute in traditionally practice-based programmes and post-92 institutions, where these drivers are at times at odds with the motivations and expertise of many of the staff who joined these institutions under different conditions. This paper presents LEGO ® SERIOUS PLAY ® as a method of enabling members of staff with diverse expertise, experience and expectations to come together to work towards a shared strategic plan in the light of the changing HE culture. The method is applied to a teacher education department within a post-92 university, where despite differing views of the challenges facing the department, consensus is achieved through the building of shared metaphors and joint narratives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McCusker, S., & Swan, J. C. (2018). The Use of Metaphors With LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY ® For Harmony and Innovation. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 5(4), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.18646/2056.54.18-013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free