Abstract
Background: Environmental and behavioral interventions hold promise to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage (SSBs) consumption. Purpose: To test, among frequent SSB consumers, whether motivations to consume SSBs moderated the effects of (a) a workplace SSB sales ban (environmental intervention) alone, and (b) a "brief motivational intervention"(BI) in addition to the sales ban, on changes in SSB consumption. Methods: We assessed whether (1) baseline motivations to consume SSBs (craving, psychological stress, or taste enjoyment) impacted changes in daily SSB consumption at 6-month follow-up among frequent (>12oz of SSBs/day) SSB consumers (N = 214); (2) participants randomized to the BI (n = 109) versus to the sales ban only (n = 105) reported greater reductions in SSB consumption at follow-up; and (3) motivations to consume SSBs moderated any changes in SSB consumption. Results: In response to the sales ban alone, individuals with stronger SSB cravings (+1 SD) at baseline showed significantly smaller reductions in daily SSB consumption at 6-month follow-up relative to individuals with weaker (-1 SD) SSB cravings (2.5 oz vs. 22.5 oz), p
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Mason, A. E., Schmidt, L., Ishkanian, L., Jacobs, L. M., Leung, C., Jensen, L., … Epel, E. S. (2021). A Brief Motivational Intervention Differentially Reduces Sugar-sweetened Beverage (SSB) Consumption. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 55(11), 1116–1129. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaa123
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.