Microcomputed tomography a noninvasive method to evaluate the fit of a restoration as compared to conventional replica technique

8Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the assessment methods used to evaluate the fit of Ni-Cr metal copings. Settings and Design: Comparative- Invitro study design. Materials and Methods: A stainless steel die simulating a prepared first maxillary premolar was used as a master die. Wax pattern copings were fabricated by the conventional dipping wax technique (n = 20) on the master die and were cast in Ni-Cr alloy. The finished copings were fitted on the master die and scanned by the micro-computed tomography (CT) scanner. Multiple projections of the sample were reconstructed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit at 5 predetermined locations. The same copings were used for the replica technique and were evaluated under a stereomicroscope in the same locations. Statistical Analysis Used: Shapiro-Wilk's test and Unpaired t-test Results: The marginal fit values observed were 127.71 and 95.06 μm, chamfer area fit values were 151.97 and 132.7 μm, axial area fit values were 62.36 and 46.14 μm, axio-occlusal area fit values were 139.52 and 123.6 μm, occlusal area fit values were slightly higher with 217.91 and 193.1 μm, respectively, in replica and micro-CT technique. There was no statistically significant difference observed in the fit between the two assessment methods ( > 0.05). Conclusions: There was no difference observed in the marginal and internal fit of Ni-Cr metal copings with the two methods of assessment. However, the micro-CT technique proved to be simpler, noninvasive, and time-saving assessment method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ram, S., Ranadive, N., & Nadgere, J. (2019). Microcomputed tomography a noninvasive method to evaluate the fit of a restoration as compared to conventional replica technique. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 19(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_71_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free