Discharge and location dependency of calibrated main channel roughness: Case study on the River Waal

9Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To accurately predict water levels, river models require an appropriate description of the hydraulic roughness. The bed roughness increases as river dunes grow with increasing discharge and the roughness depends on differences in channel width, bed level and bed sediment. Therefore, we hypothesize that the calibrated main channel roughness coefficient is most sensitive to the discharge and location in longitudinal direction of the river. The roughness is determined by calibrating the Manning coefficient of the main channel in a 1D hydrodynamic model. The River Waal in the Netherlands is used as a case study. Results show that the calibrated roughness is mainly sensitive to discharge. Especially the transition from bankfull to flood stage and effects of floodplain compartmentation are important features to consider in the calibration as these produce more accurate water level predictions. Moreover, the downstream boundary condition also has a large effect on the calibrated roughness values near the boundary.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Domhof, B. C. A., Berends, K. D., Spruyt, A., Warmink, J. J., & Hulscher, S. J. M. H. (2018). Discharge and location dependency of calibrated main channel roughness: Case study on the River Waal. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 40). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184006038

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free