Abstract
Background This review aimed to address what was known about the public health burden associated with novel psychoactive substances (NPS) use, and the effectiveness of responses targeting NPS use and/or associated problems. Methods Relevant literature was identified through a range of searches covering the period from January 2006 to June 2016. Data synthesis was undertaken in three stages. Firstly we mapped the evidence available in order to characterize the literature according to a set of analytic categories developed a priori. Secondly, we identified evidence gaps from a set of a priori research questions. Finally, we then undertook a narrative synthesis of selected bodies of evidence, interpreting data using a conceptual framework specifically designed for use in this review. Results A total of 995 articles were included in the scoping review with the majority being case reports/series on individual level adverse effects due to NPS use. We synthesized UK data from 29 surveys and 7 qualitative studies, and international data in 10 systematic reviews on harms associated with NPS use, and 17 evaluations of policy responses. We found little data on risk factors, harms associated with long-term NPS use, and interventions. Conclusion In all cases we found the available evidence to be at an early stage of development.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Meader, N., Mdege, N., & McCambridge, J. (2018). The public health evidence-base on novel psychoactive substance use: scoping review with narrative synthesis of selected bodies of evidence. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), 40(3), E303–E319. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy016
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.