Clinical role of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis

45Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The association between a gadolinium-based contrast material and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis has been discussed. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) might provide sufficient information of renal artery stenosis. Methods and Results: The non-contrast MRA of 26 patients with hypertension was retrospectively reviewed in the present study. The significant renal artery stenosis was visually evaluated by comparing non-contrast MRA with computed tomography or conventional angiographic finding. Difference of the intensities between the proximal and distal aorta was quantitatively evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of non-contrast MRA in the evaluation of the renal artery stenosis was 78%, 91%, 64% and 96%, respectively. The distal abdominal aorta showed less signal intensity than the proximal aorta by 16.9±12.2%. Conclusions: Non-contrast MRA is a non-invasive and effective method that allows evaluation of the renal artery stenosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Utsunomiya, D., Miyazaki, M., Nomitsu, Y., Komeda, Y., Okigawa, T., Urata, J., & Yamashita, Y. (2008). Clinical role of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis. Circulation Journal, 72(10), 1627–1630. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free