Digital Twins Paradigm: A Systematic Review from the Reinforcement Learning Perspective

2Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Digital Twins (DT) paradigm has emerged as a powerful tool for simulating and analyzing complex systems in various domains. A DT is a virtual representation of a real-world object(s) whose goal is to accurately emulate real systems, optimize processes, minimize synchronization delays, cut down on overhead, and automate decision-making. DT technology is moving at a faster than expected pace with advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), Distributed Computing, and 5/6G. Being a highly beneficial technology, DT still faces issues of - (1) limited adaptability, (2) incomplete model representation, (3) suboptimal decision making, (4) limited generalization, and (5) scalability and computational efficiency. Reinforcement Learning (RL) offers unsupervised decision-making and intelligence, which can be immensely beneficial in addressing the current challenges faced by DT. This study offers a thorough analysis of the DT paradigm from the standpoint of RL. The survey compares and contrasts existing reinforcement learning-based Digital Twin frameworks, assessing their advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, discussions of approaches highlighting the tradeoffs between simulation fidelity and computing complexity is also studied. Additionally, a thorough understanding of the Digital Twins paradigm from a reinforcement learning perspective, is presented as a helpful resource for academics and industry professionals in the field. Finally, future research directions in this developing field at the nexus of digital modeling, simulation, and artificial intelligence is discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohammed, S. K., Singh, S., Mizouni, R., Otrok, H., & Damiani, E. (2026). Digital Twins Paradigm: A Systematic Review from the Reinforcement Learning Perspective. ACM Computing Surveys, 58(7). https://doi.org/10.1145/3777367

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free