Real-time prediction of inpatient length of stay for discharge prioritization

106Citations
Citations of this article
339Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Hospitals are challenged to provide timely patient care while maintaining high resource utilization. This has prompted hospital initiatives to increase patient flow and minimize nonvalue added care time. Real-time demand capacity management (RTDC) is one such initiative whereby clinicians convene each morning to predict patients able to leave the same day and prioritize their remaining tasks for early discharge. Our objective is to automate and improve these discharge predictions by applying supervised machine learning methods to readily available health information. Materials and Methods: The authors use supervised machine learning methods to predict patients' likelihood of discharge by 2 p.m. and by midnight each day for an inpatient medical unit. Using data collected over 8000 patient stays and 20 000 patient days, the predictive performance of the model is compared to clinicians using sensitivity, specificity, Youden's Index (i.e., sensitivity + specificity - 1), and aggregate accuracy measures. Results: The model compared to clinician predictions demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (P .10). Early discharges were less predictable than midnight discharges. The model was more accurate than clinicians in predicting the total number of daily discharges and capable of ranking patients closest to future discharge. Conclusions: There is potential to use readily available health information to predict daily patient discharges with accuracies comparable to clinician predictions. This approach may be used to automate and support daily RTDC predictions aimed at improving patient flow.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barnes, S., Hamrock, E., Toerper, M., Siddiqui, S., & Levin, S. (2016). Real-time prediction of inpatient length of stay for discharge prioritization. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(e1), e2–e10. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free