Faculty as Designers of Authentic Learning Projects in Online Courses

3Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study investigated similarities and differences in faculty’s interpretation of authentic learning and how their interpretations were manifested into their design and implementation practices in competency-based, fully online courses. From a theoretical perspective, designing for authentic learning calls for a holistic approach, which considers various aspects, such as real-world relevance, personal meaningfulness, authentic assessment, disciplinary authenticity, and teacher authenticity. In terms of similarities across participants in this study, most faculty interpreted authentic learning as including “real-world” characteristics--that is, authentic learning is a type of learning that is situated in real-world contexts and is relevant to learners’ future careers. In terms of differences, only a few participants emphasized that authentic learning requires removing the dichotomy of a hierarchical classroom environment based on the principles of co-learning. The findings of this study also highlighted examples of authentic learning and challenges associated with implementing authentic learning in competency-based online courses. The study further provides implications for future research and practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abramenka-Lachheb, V., & Ozogul, G. (2022). Faculty as Designers of Authentic Learning Projects in Online Courses. Online Learning Journal, 26(4), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.2826

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free