The Diagnostic Properties of Medical History in the Diagnosis of Tubal Pathology among Subfertile Patients

  • Tvarijonaviciene E
  • Nadisauskiene R
  • Jariene K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives . To evaluate the diagnostic performance of medical history in the diagnosis of tubal pathology among subfertile patients. Patients and Methods . Prospective cross-sectional study was performed. Prior to tubal evaluation, medical history data were collected. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs) for predicting tubal pathology as determined by laparoscopy and dye test were calculated for each issue of medical history. Results . 39.6 % (59/149) were diagnosed with tubal pathology. The sensitivity for the different issues ranged between 1.7 and 54.2% and the specificity between 75.6 and 97.8%. The estimated highest value of positive LR is attributed to the history of ectopic pregnancy and lowest of negative LR to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and abdominal surgery. Conclusion . The positive history of PID, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), abdominal and laparoscopic surgery, and ectopic pregnancy are satisfactory screening tests for ruling the tubal pathology in. The negative history of evaluated issues is inappropriate for ruling the tubal damage out.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tvarijonaviciene, E., Nadisauskiene, R. J., Jariene, K., & Kruminis, V. (2012). The Diagnostic Properties of Medical History in the Diagnosis of Tubal Pathology among Subfertile Patients. ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/436930

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free