Survival rate of immediately vs delayed loaded implants: analysis of the current literature.

66Citations
Citations of this article
136Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Immediate loading of oral implants has been reported as a beneficial treatment protocol in implant dentistry that increases the comfort of the patient. However, documentation in the literature is poor regarding the clinical outcome and the peri-implant bone response of immediately loaded implants compared with the conventional loading protocol placed in different bone qualities. The aim of this report was to present the role of bone quality in the survival rate of implants using conventional or immediate loading according to the literature. A literature search analysis was performed to demonstrate the survival rate of immediately loaded implants, as well as data from the histologic and histomorphometric evaluation in comparison with conventional loaded implants. This analysis showed high survival rates of immediately loaded implants along with osseointegration, with high percentages of bone-to-implant contacts based on histologic evaluation from human and animal studies of immediately and conventionally loaded implants. This study may provide histologic and clinical evidence of the immediate loading protocol for different bone qualities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Romanos, G., Froum, S., Hery, C., Cho, S. C., & Tarnow, D. (2010). Survival rate of immediately vs delayed loaded implants: analysis of the current literature. The Journal of Oral Implantology. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-09-00060

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free