Risk-adapted therapy for early-stage extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma: Analysis from a multicenter study

181Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The optimal combination and sequence of radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) for extranodal nasal-type natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) are not well-defined. The aim of this study was to create a risk-adapted therapeutic strategy for early-stage NKTCL. A total of 1273 early-stage patients from 10 institutions were reviewed. Patients received CT alone (n= 170), RT alone (n =253), RT followed by CT (n = 209), or CT followed by RT (n =641). A comprehensive comparative study was performed using multivariable and propensity score-matched analyses. Early-stageNKTCLwasclassified as low risk or high risk based on 5 independent prognostic factors (stage, age, performance status, lactate dehydrogenase, primary tumor invasion). RT alone and RT with or without CT were more effective than CT alone (5-year overall survival [OS], 69.6% and 67.7% vs 33.9%, P < .001). For low-risk patients, RT alone achieved a favorable OS (88.8%); incorporation of induction or consolidation CT did not provide additional benefit (86.9% and 86.3%). For highrisk patients, RT followed by CT resulted in superior OS (72.2%) compared with induction CT and RT (58.3%, P 5 .004) or RT alone (59.6%, P 5 .017). After adjustment, similar significant differences in OS were still observed between treatment groups. New CT regimens provided limited benefit in early-stage NKTCL. Risk-adapted therapy involving RT alone for low-risk patients and RT consolidated by CT for high-risk patients is a viable, effective strategy for early-stage NKTCL. (Blood. 2015;126(12):1424-1432).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, Y., Zhu, Y., Cao, J. Z., Zhang, Y. J., Xu, L. M., Yuan, Z. Y., … Li, Y. X. (2015). Risk-adapted therapy for early-stage extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma: Analysis from a multicenter study. Blood, 126(12), 1424–1432. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-04-639336

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free