Metabolic quotient and specific enzymatic activity in response to the addition of organic amendments to mining tailings

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Adding organic amendments to mining tailings to ameliorate extreme conditions that limit plant growth is a common practice in reclamation projects; still, the impact on microbial activity is not commonly considered. This work aimed to explore the use of the metabolic quotient and specific enzymatic activity as indicators of microbial carbon use efficiency in response to adding organic amendments to mining tailings. An experiment in vitro on adding organic amendments: compost, biochar, a mixture of them, and no addition on mining tailing from Taxco, Guerrero, Mexico, was established. Carbon mineralization, microbial biomass, and the enzymatic activity of β-glucosidase, phosphatase, polyphenol oxidase, and dehydrogenase were measured, while specific enzymatic activity and metabolic quotient were calculated. The results showed that microbial activity increased by adding all organic amendments in the following order: compost > mixture > biochar. In the treatment with the addition of compost, we observed a higher carbon mineralization and a greater enzymatic activity. The treatment with adding biochar showed similarities with the control treatment in parameters related to carbon dynamics, such as β-glucosidase, dehydrogenase, and carbon mineralization. This reflects microorganisms’ trade-off between investing energy in searching for resources or using them to improve their biomass clearly to view the specific enzymatic activity and metabolic quotient indicators.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nava-Arsola, N. E., Beltrán-Paz, O., Martínez-Jardines, G., & Chávez-Vergara, B. (2024). Metabolic quotient and specific enzymatic activity in response to the addition of organic amendments to mining tailings. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 21(4), 4239–4250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05280-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free