Fractional flow reserve with dobutamine challenge and coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction in symptomatic myocardial bridging

26Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Myocardial bridging (MB) results in compression of the coronary artery lumen in systole, extending into diastole with resultant hemodynamic alternation as reflected by fractional flow reserve (FFR). MB has also been associated with coronary endothelial dysfunction. The objective of this study was to investigate relationship between FFR with dobutamine challenge and coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction in symptomatic MB. Methods and Results: Seventeen consecutive patients who had cardiac catheterization assessment of MB were enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to normal (% increase in coronary blood flow [%CBF] ≥50%, n=7) or impaired (%CBF <50%, n=10) coronary microvascular endothelial function assessed on vasoreactivity in the coronary artery with intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine (Ach). Myocardial ischemia was then assessed using FFR at rest and during i.v. dobutamine infusion challenge across the MB with intracoronary pressure wires. FFR was significantly decreased at peak dobutamine infusion compared to at rest in the impaired group (0.85±0.06 vs. 0.91±0.05, P=0.001), but not in the normal group (0.93±0.05 vs. 0.91±0.07, P=0.618). Both FFR at rest and at peak dobutamine infusion had a positive correlation with %CBF by Ach in the impaired group (r2=0.46, P=0.030; r2=0.52, P=0.018, respectively). Conclusions: Microvascular endothelial dysfunction was associated with decreased FFR at peak dobutamine stress in patients with symptomatic MB.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yoshino, S., Cassar, A., Matsuo, Y., Herrmann, J., Gulati, R., Prasad, A., … Lerman, A. (2014). Fractional flow reserve with dobutamine challenge and coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction in symptomatic myocardial bridging. Circulation Journal, 78(3), 687–692. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-13-0846

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free