The risk of early infection following intra-articular corticosteroid injection following shoulder arthroplasty

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: There is little literature examining the association of corticosteroid injections into shoulders with a pre-existing arthroplasty. The aim of the current study was to determine the risk of early infection following intra-articular corticosteroid injection into a pre-existing shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: The PearlDiver database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with a pre-existing shoulder arthroplasty from 2007 to 2017. Patients with an ipsilateral shoulder corticosteroid injection in the postoperative period were identified. A control group of patients without an injection was matched 4:1 by age, gender, and postoperative timepoint. Periprosthetic infection within six months after the injection was then assessed and compared using a logistic regression analysis. Results: Nine hundred and fifty-eight patients were identified who underwent a postoperative corticosteroid injection into a pre-existing shoulder arthroplasty and compared to 3832 control patients. After controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and procedure type, the rate of infection in patients who received a postoperative corticosteroid injection (1.77%) was significantly higher than control patients who did not receive an injection (0.91%) (OR 1.98 (95% CI 1.31–2.98), p = 0.0253). Conclusions: There is a significant association between intra-articular shoulder corticosteroid injections in patients with pre-existing shoulder arthroplasties and prosthetic joint infection compared to matched controls without postoperative injections. Study Design: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cancienne, J. M., & Werner, B. C. (2021). The risk of early infection following intra-articular corticosteroid injection following shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder and Elbow, 13(6), 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573220925817

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free