Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data?

  • Mallitt K
  • Wilson D
  • McDonald A
  • et al.
3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Accurate estimates of HIV incidence are crucial to understand the extent of transmission of the infection, evaluate intervention strategies and effectively plan new public health control measures. HIV/AIDS surveillance systems in numerous industrialised countries record the number of known new HIV and/or AIDS diagnoses, which are often used as a surrogate marker for HIV incidence. HIV/AIDS diagnosis data have been used to reconstruct historical HIV incidence trends using modified back-projection methods. Estimates of HIV incidence are most robust when reliable data on the number of incident infections, a subset of all diagnoses, is widely available, and surveillance systems should prioritise the collection of these data. Back-projection alone provides reliable estimates of HIV incidence in the past, but is not useful when estimating current or future HIV incidence. However, back-projection methodology should be used in conjunction with other corroborative methods to estimate current HIV incidence, and methods to combine the various techniques should be investigated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mallitt, K.-A., Wilson, D. P., McDonald, A., & Wand, H. (2012). Is Back-Projection Methodology Still Relevant for Estimating HIV Incidence from National Surveillance Data? The Open AIDS Journal, 6(1), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874613601206010108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free