Low risk of local recurrence after a successful en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection for noninvasive colorectal lesions with positive horizontal resection margins (R-ESD study)

11Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background During endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the normal mucosa is cut under constant optical control. We studied whether a positive horizontal resection margin after a complete en bloc ESD predicts local recurrence. Methods In this European multicenter cohort study, patients with a complete en bloc colorectal ESD were selected from prospective registries. Cases were defined by a horizontal resection margin that was positive or indeterminate for dysplasia (HM1), whereas controls had a free resection margin (HM0). Low risk lesions with submucosal invasion (T1) and margins free of carcinoma were analyzed separately. The main outcome was local recurrence. Results From 928 consecutive ESDs (2011–2020), 354 patients (40% female; mean age 67 years, median follow-up 23.6 months), with 308 noninvasive lesions and 46 T1 lesions, were included. The recurrence rate for noninvasive lesions was 1/212 (0.5 %; 95 %CI 0.02%–2.6%) for HM0 vs. 2/96 (2.1 %; 95 %CI 0.57%–7.3%) for HM1.The recurrence rate for T1 lesions was 1/38 (2.6%; 95%CI 0.14%–13.5%) for HM0 vs. 2/8 (25%; 95%CI 7.2%–59.1 %) for HM1. Conclusion A positive horizontal resection margin after an en bloc ESD for noninvasive lesions is associated with a marginal nonsignificant increase in the local recurrence rate, equal to an ESD with clear horizontal margins. This could not be confirmed for T1 lesions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haasnoot, K. J. C., Baldaque-Silva, F., Koch, A., Figueiredo Ferreira, M., Santos-Antunes, J., Dias, E., … Moons, L. M. G. (2023). Low risk of local recurrence after a successful en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection for noninvasive colorectal lesions with positive horizontal resection margins (R-ESD study). Endoscopy, 55(3), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1960-3552

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free