Short vs standard implants associated with sinus floor elevation: a randomized controlled trial

  • Vetromilla B
  • Silva G
  • Neto V
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: the present equivalence two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial aimed to compare survival and marginal bone loss (MBL) of short implants (≤6 mm) and standard implants (≥8.5 mm) associated with sinus floor elevation (SFE). Methods: adult patients with partial edentulism with occlusal stability in the sinus area and intermediate bone height were selected in this double-blind trial (patient and outcome assessment). Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: standard length implants with SFE (control) or short implants (test). Clinical and radiographic assessments were made at the time of implant placement, 6 months, and annually thereafter up to 2 years after loading. The inter-examiner agreement was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). One-way ANOVA, Kaplan-Meier, and Log-rank tests were used to compare implant survival (primary outcome) and MBL (secondary outcome) (P<0.05). Results: eight short implants and six standard implants were placed (mean age of patients was 47 ±12.5 years). The implant survival rates were 87.5% for short (one 5 mm implant failed at 7 months) and 100% for standard implants with no statistically significant difference between groups (P=0.4). The mean MBL after 1 year was 0.30 ±0.62 mm for short and 0.21 ±0.36 mm for standard implants (P=0.123). The inter-examiner agreement was set in 0.831. Conclusion: survival of short implants and standard implants associated with SFE was similar after two years of clinical service. Trial registration: Registered on 27-03-2018 at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03479333). Funding: This study was partially funded by Capes Finance Code 001 and #88881.187933/2018-01. TPC is partially funded by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - Brazil). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.Keywords: bone resorption; dental implants; sinus floor augmentation; survival.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vetromilla, B. M., Silva, G. D. L., Neto, V. P., Manentti Fogaça, A. C., & Cenci, T. P. (2023). Short vs standard implants associated with sinus floor elevation: a randomized controlled trial. Revista Da Faculdade de Odontologia - UPF, 26(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v26i1.12327

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free