Susceptibility of Some Florida Chironomids and Mosquitoes to Various Formulations ofBacillus thuringiensis serovar. israelensis123

  • Ali A
  • Baggs R
  • Stewart J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Three wettable powders (WP), IPS-78, R-153-78, and ABG-6108, and one flowable concentrate (FC), SAN-402-WDC, of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar. israelensis de Barjac were tested in the laboratory against Ist-and 3rd-instar Glyptotendipes paripes Edwards, and 3rd-instar Chironomus crassicaudatus Malloch, C. decorus Johannsen, and Tanyt~rsus sPI? The B. thuringie'!Sis serovar. israelensis formulations also were tested agamst 3rd-ms~ar A~des aegyptl (L.), ~nd Culex qlfinquefasciatus Say. The R-153-78 was mvanably the most actIve preparatIOn against midges (LC = 4.56-9.84 ppm) and mosquitoes (LC90 = 0.13 and 0.24 ppm) followed by IPS-78 The LC90 of th~ midge species ranged from 4.56 to 47.02 ppm, whereas the same rang~ for the mosq~ltoes was 0.13 to 0.99 ppm. The Ist-instar G. paripes was 10-to 14-fold m~re suscepttble to B. thuringiensis serovar. israelensis than its 3rd instar. The mos-9Utto la~ae were 1~-to 75-fold more susceptible to the various B. thuringiensis serovar. lSraelensl~ preparatIOns than ~ere the midge larvae even at half the exposure time. The provIsIon o~ fo.od ~o the mldg~ and the mosquito larvae impaired the effectiveness of each B. thurmglensls serovar. lsrae/ensis formulation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ali, A., Baggs, R. D., & Stewart, J. P. (1981). Susceptibility of Some Florida Chironomids and Mosquitoes to Various Formulations ofBacillus thuringiensis serovar. israelensis123. Journal of Economic Entomology, 74(6), 672–677. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/74.6.672

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free