Reducing waste in nutritional epidemiology: Review and perspectives

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We discuss efforts in improving the value of nutrition research. We organised the paper in five research stages: Stage 1: research priority setting; Stage 2: research design, conduct and analysis; Stage 3: research regulation and management; Stage 4: research accessibility and Stage 5: research reporting and publishing. Along the stages of the research cycle, varied initiatives exist to improve the quality and added value of nutrition research. However, efforts are focused on single stages of the research cycle without vision of the research system as a whole. Although research on nutrition research has been limited, it has potential to improve the quality of nutrition research and develop new tools and instruments for this purpose. A comprehensive assessment of the magnitude of research waste in nutrition and consensus on priority actions is needed. The nutrition research community at large needs to have open discussions on the usefulness of these tools and lead suitable efforts to enhance nutrition research across the stages of the research cycle. Capacity building is essential and considerations of nutrition research quality are vital to be integrated in training efforts of nutrition researchers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hawwash, D., Yang, C., & Lachat, C. (2019). Reducing waste in nutritional epidemiology: Review and perspectives. In Proceedings of the Nutrition Society (Vol. 78, pp. 475–483). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002966511900051X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free