Methodological interculturalism: breaking down epistemological barriers around diversity management

15Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As part of the post-multicultural era, transnationalism, super-diversity, cosmopolitanism and solidarity develop a sense of awareness to live in a complex society. This requests us to identify the epistemological barriers preventing us to produce new knowledge, since there is a raising consciousness that these new frameworks cannot be addressed with old policy maps. All share the need to go beyond methodological nationalism, and one of its by-products: multiculturalism. Methodological interculturalism is a promising epistemological lens through which to cluster this new diversity geography. It is a direct answer to the key question, what happens when the unit of analysis from which we argue about “how to live together” is diversity itself rather than a supposed us/we/unity/ majority/state/nation lens. The outcome is the recognition that super-diversity and transnationalism is a fact that we need to incorporate into our public culture, together with new normative claims of justice related to cosmopolitanism and solidarity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zapata-Barrero, R. (2019, February 17). Methodological interculturalism: breaking down epistemological barriers around diversity management. Ethnic and Racial Studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2019.1538527

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free