Evaluasi Pilkada Pelaksanaan Pilkada Serentak Tahun 2015

  • Chaniago P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
192Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate the enforcement of the first direct district heads election in 2015, in order to promote the quality of democracy. This study applied qualitative method. There were several findings on this study; (1) direct district heads election has not been efficient yet; (2) direct district heads election has not been able to promote political participation; (3) direct district heads election has not been able to shut off money politic; (4) recruitment the election of district head candidates has not been transparant; (5) financing of direct election was not charged (appropriate) to Regional Government Budget; (6) Constitutional Court refused to adjudicate the dispute of election results if the margin of ballot more than 2%, it broke sense of justice; (7) the phenomenon of the emergence of a single candidate for district heads due to regulations, the must withdraw from candidacy for they were civil servants, military/police, House of Representatives, Regional Representative Board and Regional House of Representatives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chaniago, P. S. (2016). Evaluasi Pilkada Pelaksanaan Pilkada Serentak Tahun 2015. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 1(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v1i2.6585

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free