Impact of type of health care provider on long term asthma control

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Asthma prevalence is high and adherence to asthma guidelines is still less than adequate. The main objective of this study was to determine if there were significant differences in outcome measures if asthma care was provided per guidelines either by physicians (pediatric pulmonologists) or specialty trained advance practice nurses (APNs) Methods: This was a three-year, prospective cohort study of children referred by their primary care providers to a tertiary care center for better asthma control. Patients were provided asthma care per NAEPP guidelines including asthma education. Results were compared over time and between patients followed by physicians or APNs. Alpha level of significance was ≤0.05. Results: The sample included 471 children, ages 2–17 years (mean = 6.4 ± 2.4 years). Physicians and APN’s provided asthma care. Of the 471 children enrolled in the study, 176 (37%) were followed for the full three-year study period. At the initial visit, physician group reported more short courses of oral steroids and more unscheduled visits to PCP for acute asthma care in the past 6 months compared to those followed by APNs (<0.05 for all). Among the total cohort and both subgroups, there were significant improvements in mean Asthma Control Test (ACT), acute care need and mean days/month with asthma symptoms over a three-year period (p < 0.05). There was significantly more improvement in use of oral steroids and urgent care visits in physician group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: When asthma guidelines are followed, improvements in asthma control are achieved in children in both the MD and APN groups.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sheikh, S. I., Ryan-Wenger, N. A., May, A., Krivchenia, K., & Pitts, J. (2022). Impact of type of health care provider on long term asthma control. Journal of Asthma, 59(5), 1012–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2021.1892750

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free