Reducibility among combinatorial problems

234Citations
Citations of this article
1.1kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Throughout the 1960s I worked on combinatorial optimization problems including logic circuit design with Paul Roth and assembly line balancing and the traveling salesman problem with Mike Held. These experiences made me aware that seemingly simple discrete optimization problems could hold the seeds of combinatorial explosions. The work of Dantzig, Fulkerson, Hoffman, Edmonds, Lawler and other pioneers on network flows, matching and matroids acquainted me with the elegant and efficient algorithms that were sometimes possible. Jack Edmonds' papers and a few key discussions with him drew my attention to the crucial distinction between polynomial-time and superpolynomial-time solvability. I was also influenced by Jack's emphasis on min-max theorems as a tool for fast verification of optimal solutions, which foreshadowed Steve Cook's definition of the complexity class NP. Another influence was George Dantzig's suggestion that integer programming could serve as a universal format for combinatorial optimization problems. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karp, R. M. (2010). Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In 50 Years of Integer Programming 1958-2008: From the Early Years to the State-of-the-Art (pp. 219–241). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68279-0_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free