Limitaciones de interpretación de la terminología utilizada en el abordaje dietético de las dietas de textura modificada

4Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The management of dysphagia requires a multidisciplinary approach including diet. The right adaptation of the texture of solid foods and viscosity of liquids to swallow functional capacity of the patient is key to the safety, nutritional adequacy and sensory quality of the diet. Objective: To know different terminologies for describing texture and viscosity of food used in the design of texture modified diets (TMD) and to discuss the limitations in its practical interpretation. Methodology: Review (2010-2015) in Web of Science with search terms (Spanish and English): texture modified foods, texture modified diet, dysphagia, swallowing, thickened fluids, dementia, dysphagia in the elderly, diet modification, molecular gastronomy Results: Scientific literature agrees on the general guidelines for the dietary approach of dysphagia but partially differs in terminologies and descriptors (and their interpretation) of texture in solid foods and viscosity of liquids, which limits the comparability of studies and promotes confusion in practical use. The wide variability between institutions and countries is also reflected in the guidelines and proposed TMD menus with different nutritional and organoleptic quality. Conclusions: To review some descriptors of texture and viscosity to unify criteria and facilitate their application at home is necessary. To extend the DTM studies to sensory and hedonic aspects would be very important to improve their palatability and control environmental factors that influence in it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Solano Pérez, L. A., Cuadrado Vives, C., & Beltrán De Miguel, B. (2017). Limitaciones de interpretación de la terminología utilizada en el abordaje dietético de las dietas de textura modificada. Nutricion Clinica y Dietetica Hospitalaria, 37(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.12873/372cuadrado

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free