Radiomics predicts risk of cachexia in advanced NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

36Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Approximately 50% of cancer patients eventually develop a syndrome of prolonged weight loss (cachexia), which may contribute to primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). This study utilised radiomics analysis of 18F-FDG-PET/CT images to predict risk of cachexia that can be subsequently associated with clinical outcomes among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with ICI. Methods: Baseline (pre-therapy) PET/CT images and clinical data were retrospectively curated from 210 ICI-treated NSCLC patients from two institutions. A radiomics signature was developed to predict the cachexia with PET/CT images, which was further used to predict durable clinical benefit (DCB), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) following ICI. Results: The radiomics signature predicted risk of cachexia with areas under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs) ≥ 0.74 in the training, test, and external test cohorts. Further, the radiomics signature could identify patients with DCB from ICI with AUCs≥0.66 in these three cohorts. PFS and OS were significantly shorter among patients with higher radiomics-based cachexia probability in all three cohorts, especially among those potentially immunotherapy sensitive patients with PD-L1-positive status (p < 0.05). Conclusions: PET/CT radiomics analysis has the potential to predict the probability of developing cachexia before the start of ICI, triggering aggressive monitoring to improve potential to achieve more clinical benefit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mu, W., Katsoulakis, E., Whelan, C. J., Gage, K. L., Schabath, M. B., & Gillies, R. J. (2021). Radiomics predicts risk of cachexia in advanced NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. British Journal of Cancer, 125(2), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01375-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free