Abstract
Objective: Prehospital rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is an important aspect of prehospital care for helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS). This study examines the feasibility of in-aircraft (aircraft on the ground) RSI in different simulated settings. Methods: Using an AW169 aircraft cabin simulator at Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, 3 clinical scenarios were devised. All required RSI in a “can intubate, can ventilate” (easy variant) and a “can't intubate, can't ventilate” scenario (difficult variant). Doctor-paramedic HEMS teams were video recorded, and elapsed times for prespecified end points were analyzed. Results: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) was achieved fastest outside the simulator for the easy variant (median = 231 seconds, interquartile range = 28 seconds). Time to ETI was not significantly longer for in-aircraft RSI compared with RSI outside the aircraft, both in the easy (p =. 14) and difficult variant (p =. 50). Wearing helmets with noise distraction did not impact the time to intubation when compared with standard in-aircraft RSI, both in the easy (p =. 28) and difficult variant (p =. 24). Conclusion: In-aircraft, on-the-ground RSI had no significant impact on the time to successful completion of ETI. Future studies should prospectively examine in-cabin RSI and explore the possibilities of in-flight RSI in civilian HEMS services.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
McHenry, A. S., Curtis, L., Avest, E. ter, Russell, M. Q., Halls, A. V., Mitchinson, S., … Lyon, R. M. (2020). Feasibility of Prehospital Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Cabin of an AW169 Helicopter. Air Medical Journal, 39(6), 468–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2020.08.006
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.