Specimen mammography for intraoperative margin assessment in breast conserving surgery: a meta-analysis

13Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In breast conserving surgery (BCS), specimen mammography is one of the most widely used intraoperative methods of assessing margin status. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of specimen mammography. Literature databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched prior to Jun 2022. A total of 1967 patients were included from 20 studies. A pooled analysis, heterogeneity testing, threshold effect testing, publication bias analysis, and subgroup analyses were performed from extracted data. The pooled weighted values were a sensitivity of 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47–0.63), a specificity of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78–0.90), a diagnostic odds ratio of 7 (95% CI, 4–12), and a pooled positive likelihood ratio of 3.7 (95% CI 2.6–5.5). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.75 (95% CI 0.71–0.78). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled specificity in the positive margin defined as tumor at margin subgroup was lower than the other positive margin definition subgroup (0.82 [95% CI: 0.71, 0.92] vs. 0.87 [95% CI: 0.80, 0.94], p = 0.01). Our findings indicated that specimen mammography was an accurate intraoperative imaging technique for margin assessment in BCS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lin, C., Wang, K. yue, Chen, H. lang, Xu, Y. hua, Pan, T., & Chen, Y. ding. (2022). Specimen mammography for intraoperative margin assessment in breast conserving surgery: a meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23234-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free