Abstract
In early epidemiological studies of diet and cancer the stress was on the search for causal factors. Population (ecological) studies tended to show a strong correlation between meat intake, particularly red meat, and the risk of colo-rectal cancer. They also tended to show meat to be strongly inversely correlated with cancers of the stomach and oesophagus and liver. Early case- control studies tended to support the postulated role for red meat in colo-rectal carcinogenesis, although more recent case-control studies, particularly those from Europe, have tended to show no relationship. The cohort studies in general failed to detect any relationship between meat intake and colo-rectal cancer risk. The available evidence points to the intake of protective factors such as vegetables and whole-grain cereals being the main determinants of colo-rectal cancer risk, with meat intake only coincidentally related.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hill, M. J. (1999). Meat and colo-rectal cancer. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 58(2), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002966519900035x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.