Establishing long-term survival and cure in young patients with Ewing's sarcoma

22Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper investigates the potential for long-term survivorship for young patients diagnosed with Ewing's sarcoma. Data are examined from two successive UKCCSG Ewing's Tumour studies (ET-1 and ET-2). Patients have been followed for up to 20 years. These studies had suggested that better 5-year survival with ET-2 over the earlier ET-1 was achieved by replacing cyclophosphamide by ifosfamide and increasing the dose of doxorubicin in a four-drug chemotherapy regimen. The updated hazard ratio, stratified for metastatic status at diagnosis, of 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.61) confirmed the advantage of the ET-2 regimen in terms of overall survival. Cure models, based on the Weibull distribution, suggested that factors for long-term survival in addition to presence of metastases were age, primary site of tumour and study. Modelling identified the proportion cured with the ET-2 protocol as best at 70% in those who are under 10 years with a nonpelvic primary site and without metastatic disease. This contrasts to only 13% cure in those with the corresponding adverse prognostic indicators. Additionally, the risk of death remains greatest but relatively constant over the first 2 years postdiagnosis, and then declines to a lower but constant value for the next 3 years before reaching the 'cure plateau' at about 5 years. This investigation suggests that 'cure' is possible for patients with Ewing's sarcoma. This is established at approximately 5 years post diagnosis and the proportion cured depends on the presence of metastases, pelvic site and age at diagnosis. © 2004 Cancer Research UK.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weston, C. L., Douglas, C., Craft, A. W., Lewis, I. J., & Machin, D. (2004). Establishing long-term survival and cure in young patients with Ewing’s sarcoma. British Journal of Cancer, 91(2), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601955

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free