Multidomain intervention for the prevention of cognitive decline after stroke – a pooled patient-level data analysis

19Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and purpose: The aim of this pooled patient-level data analysis was to test if multidomain interventions, addressing several modifiable vascular risk factors simultaneously, are more effective than usual post-stroke care for the prevention of cognitive decline after stroke. Methods: This pooled patient-level data analysis included two randomized controlled trials using a multidomain approach to target vascular risk factors in stroke patients and cognition as primary outcome. Changes from baseline to 12 months in the trail making test (TMT)-A, TMT-B and 10-words test were analysed using stepwise backward linear mixed models with study as random factor. Two analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle using different imputation approaches and one was based on complete cases. Results: Data from 322 patients (157 assigned to multidomain intervention and 165 to standard care) were analysed. Differences between randomization groups for TMT-A scores were found in one ITT model (P = 0.014) and approached significance in the second ITT model (P = 0.087) and for complete cases (P = 0.091). No significant intervention effects were found for any of the other cognitive variables. Conclusion: We found indications that multidomain interventions compared with standard care can improve the scores in TMT-A at 1 year after stroke but not those for TMT-B or the 10-words test. These results have to be interpreted with caution due to the small number of patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Teuschl, Y., Ihle-Hansen, H., Matz, K., Dachenhausen, A., Ratajczak, P., Tuomilehto, J., … Brainin, M. (2018). Multidomain intervention for the prevention of cognitive decline after stroke – a pooled patient-level data analysis. European Journal of Neurology, 25(9), 1182–1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13684

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free