For safety’s sake: The strategies of institutional entrepreneurs and bureaucratic reforms in Swedish crisis management, 2001–2009

22Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study focuses on the bureaucratic reforms in Sweden which resulted in the creation of the Secretariat for Crisis Management and the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. We investigate the mechanisms that lead to divergent change through the critical juncture analytical approach. The study’s findings suggest that the bureaucratic reforms were the result of the critical juncture between 2001 and 2009, which included, inter alia, the release of a commission of inquiry report, a major political crisis and a national election. Moreover, we situate entrepreneurial agency in this analysis while we contribute to the theorization of institutional entrepreneurship by focusing on the implementation stage of institutional change. In order to overcome the institutional resistance stemming from an attempt to preserve the existing power structures, institutional entrepreneurs use the following three strategies: (i) the strategy of listening; (ii) the strategy of advertising early success and (iii) the strategy of picking up the phone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petridou, E., & Sparf, J. (2017). For safety’s sake: The strategies of institutional entrepreneurs and bureaucratic reforms in Swedish crisis management, 2001–2009. Policy and Society, 36(4), 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1369677

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free