Comparison of Multi-Risk Perceptions and Sociodemographic Characteristics in South Korea: Cognitive and Affective Dimensions

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the real world, environmental and social risks coexist, and the interactions among these multiple risks necessitate research on risk perception in a multi-risk context. This study aims to explore how the public perceives multiple risks and to investigate perception differences based on sociodemographic factors. Based on the classification of the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 14 risks were investigated through a web-based survey of 1,035 individuals from South Korea. We employed a latent class model (LCA) to identify confounding sources among risk perceptions and utilized multinomial logistic regression to examine factors influencing risk perception dimensions. Cognitive and affective risk perceptions were found to be higher for climate change and global warming, air pollution, destruction of biodiversity and the environment, economic crisis, recession, low fertility, aging of society, and depopulation. Women, residents of Gwangju, Jeolla, and Jeju, and college-educated participants were more sensitive to cognitive risk perception. Those aged 30 to 39 and of lower economic status were more sensitive to affective risk perception, whereas men were less sensitive. Cognitive and affective risk perceptions were distinct but correlated. These findings provide insights for improving decision-making in crisis situations by informing the government and policymakers about public priorities. Specifically, by identifying demographically sensitive subgroups, the study can contribute to enhance risk communication strategies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Do, R., Bak, K. Y., Lee, S. Y., Jung, M., Kim, S., Jang, D. H., … Jang, W. M. (2025). Comparison of Multi-Risk Perceptions and Sociodemographic Characteristics in South Korea: Cognitive and Affective Dimensions. SAGE Open, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251321269

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free