Analysis of prognosis and background liver disease in non-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in two decades

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim Antiviral hepatitis and systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remarkably progressed in the recent 10 years. This study aimed to reveal the actual transition and changes in the prognosis and background liver disease in non-advanced HCC in the past 20 years. Methods This retrospectively recruited 566 patients who were diagnosed with non-advanced HCC from February 2002 to February 2022. The prognosis was analyzed by subdividing according to the diagnosis date (period I: February 2002–April 2009 and period Ⅱ: May 2009–Feb-ruary 2022). Results Patients in period II (n = 351) were significantly older, with lower albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and more anti-viral therapy, systemic therapy, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy as compared with those in period I (n = 215). The etiology ratio of the background liver disease revealed decreased hepatitis C virus from 70.6% to 49.0% and increased non-B, non-C from 17.7% to 39.9% from periods I to Ⅱ. The multivariate analysis revealed older age and higher ALBI score in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 0/A stage, AFP of >20 ng/mL, and higher ALBI score in BCLC B stage as independent prognosis factors. Fine-Gray competing risk model analysis revealed that liver-related deaths significantly decreased in period II as compared to period I, especially for BCLC stage 0/A (HR: 0.656; 95%CI: 0.442–0.972, P = 0.036). Conclusion The characteristics of patients with non-advanced HCC have changed over time. Appropriate background liver management led to better liver-related prognoses in BCLC 0/A.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaneko, S., Asahina, Y., Murakawa, M., Azuma, S., Inada, K., Mochida, T., … Okamoto, R. (2024). Analysis of prognosis and background liver disease in non-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in two decades. PLoS ONE, 19(3 March). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297882

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free