Addressing the sustainable urbanism paradox: tipping points for the operational reconciliation of dense and green morphologies

4Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To improve biodiversity and human living conditions in the Anthropocene, urban forms must reconcile density with vegetation to meet the dual sustainability-liveability challenge. This paradox poses a dilemma for urban planners and is a critical research issue requiring comprehensive analyses. Multi-family residential housing holds the potential to achieve balanced density-greening, proximity ecosystem services and human-nature connectedness, but meeting such objectives relies on finding balanced morphologies and metrics at an operational scale. Analysing 11,593 plots in the Lyon metropolitan area (France) using a systemic approach, we identified critical tipping points in morphology and greening. Density explained only 6% of Plot Greening, while morphology and landscaping accounted for 94%. We identified an open-space ratio (unbuilt area/floor area) >0.3 as a morphological threshold to achieve sustainable green supply. Operational morphologies balancing density and greening were modelled and illustrated across building heights, providing guidelines for emerging regulatory tools in sustainable urban planning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boutreux, T., Bourgeois, M., Bellec, A., Commeaux, F., & Kaufmann, B. (2024). Addressing the sustainable urbanism paradox: tipping points for the operational reconciliation of dense and green morphologies. Npj Urban Sustainability, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-024-00176-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free