Evaluating software engineering methods and tool part 1

  • Kitchenham B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the last five issues of SIGSOFT Notes, Shari Lawrence Pfleeger has discussed the use of formal experiments to evaluate software engineering methods and tools [1]. Shari's articles were based on work she performed for the U.K. DESMET project which aimed to develop a methodology for evaluating software engineering methods and tools.The DESMET project identified a number of useful evaluation methods in addition to formal experiments, and Shari asked me to continue this column by describing some of other methods. As a starting point, I will give an overview of the scope of the DESMET methodology in this article and describe the nine different evaluation methods DESMET identified. In the next few articles I will discuss criteria for selecting a specific method in particular circumstances. Later I will present the DESMET guidelines for performing quantitative case studies and feature analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kitchenham, B. A. (1996). Evaluating software engineering methods and tool part 1. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 21(1), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/381790.381795

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free