Eccentric overload differences between loads and training variables on flywheel training

16Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is considerable debate about the existence of a real eccentric overload in flywheel exercises. This study aimed to analyse the differences in concentric: eccentric mechanical output ratios between different loads and variables in the flywheel squat exercise. Twenty physically active men (22.9 ± 2.2 years, height: 1.8 ± 0.1 m, weight: 79.6 ± 8.2 kg) performed a loading test using five moments of inertia. Angular speed was measured using a rotary encoder, while the vertical force was measured using force plates. For each variable (angular speed, angular acceleration, power, vertical force, and torque), mean and peak values were calculated for concentric and eccentric phases to allow comparisons across the loads. We tested the possible differences in Load × Phase (concentric and eccentric) and Load × Variable. The level of significance was established as p < 0.05. A significant Load × Phase interaction was found in mean angular speed, peak vertical force, peak angular acceleration, peak power and peak torque. Higher eccentric overload values were observed with speed-derived variables (angular speed, angular acceleration and power). In conclusion, speed-derived peak variables and lower loads are more likely to show an eccentric overload and can be used to monitor responses to flywheel training.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muñoz-López, A., Nakamura, F. Y., & Beato, M. (2023). Eccentric overload differences between loads and training variables on flywheel training. Biology of Sport, 40(4), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.122483

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free