Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

ESBLs are a group of plasmid-mediated, diverse, complex and rapidly evolving enzymes that pose a therapeutic challenge today in hospital-and community-acquired infections. Thirty-six years after the first report, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for ESBLs are still the subject of controversy. Detection of these enzymes is recommended for epidemiological purposes and facilitates targeted therapy, necessary for antimicrobial stewardship. On the other hand, ESBLs are not confined to specific species, phenotypic detection methods have pitfalls, and concerns exist about the accuracy of antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems to rely on MIC values for cephalosporins and b-lactam combination agents. In this issue, we present a PRO/CON debate on ESBL testing for ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Villegas, M. V., Esparza, G., & Reyes, J. (2021). Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free