Early lymphocyte collection for anti-CD19 CART production improves T-cell fitness in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

23Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeted to the CD19 B-cell antigen form an approved treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). However, since this therapy is administered after multiple lines of treatment and exposure to lymphotoxic agents, there is an urgent need to optimize this modality of treatment. Methods: To circumvent the difficulties of harvesting adequate and optimal T cells from DLBCL patients and improve CART therapy, we suggest an earlier lymphopheresis (i.e. at first relapse, before salvage treatment). We conducted a prospective study and evaluated the potential benefit of an earlier lymphopheresis (early group, n = 22) on the clinical outcome of CD19-CART infused DLBCL patients, in comparison with standard lymphopheresis (i.e. at second relapse and beyond; standard group, n = 23). Results: An increased percentage of naïve T cells and increased in vitro T-cell functionality were observed in the early group. Additionally, these cells exhibit a lower exhaustion profile than T cells collected in the standard group. Conclusion: While improved T-cell phenotype and function in the lymphopheresis product did not translate into significantly improved clinical outcomes, a trend towards better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was observed. Early lymphopheresis maximizes the potential of salvage therapies, without compromising CAR T-cell quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dubnikov Sharon, T., Assayag, M., Avni, B., Kfir-Erenfeld, S., Lebel, E., Gatt, M. E., … Grisariu, S. (2023). Early lymphocyte collection for anti-CD19 CART production improves T-cell fitness in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. British Journal of Haematology, 202(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.18816

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free