Comparative Performance Analysis of Data Transmission Protocols for Sensor-to-Cloud Applications: An Experimental Evaluation †

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper examines some of the most popular protocols for transmitting sensor data to cloud structures from publish/subscribe and request/response IoT models. The selection of a highly efficient message transmission protocol is essential, as it depends on the specific characteristics and purpose of the developed IoT system, which includes communication requirements, message size and format, energy efficiency, reliability, and cloud specifications. No standardized protocol can cover all the diverse application scenarios; therefore, for each developed project, the most appropriate protocol must be selected that meets the project’s specific requirements. This work focuses on finding the most appropriate protocol for integrating sensor data into a suitable open-source IoT platform, ThingsBoard. First, we conduct a comparative analysis of the studied protocols. Then, we propose a project that represents an experiment for transmitting data from a stationary XBee sensor network to the ThingsBoard cloud via HTTP, MQTT-SN, and CoAP protocols. We observe the parameters’ influence on the delayed transmission of packets and their load on the CPU and RAM. The results of the experimental studies for stationary sensor networks collecting environmental data give an advantage to the MQTT-SN protocol. This protocol is preferable to the other two protocols due to the lower delay and load on the processor and memory, which leads to higher energy efficiency and longer life of the sensors and sensor networks. These results can help users make operational judgments for their IoT applications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsvetanov, F., & Pandurski, M. (2025). Comparative Performance Analysis of Data Transmission Protocols for Sensor-to-Cloud Applications: An Experimental Evaluation †. Engineering Proceedings, 104(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025104035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free