Pecking-Order or Static Trade-off Theory in Family Firms? Evidence from Belgium

  • Bauweraerts J
  • Colot O
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether a difference can be stated in the family firms' financial choices. Using the Shyam-Sunder and Myers model, our research focus on the financial behaviour of family and non-family privately held firms in Belgium. Out of a sample of 210 privately held firms for the period 2002-2010, panel data methodology is employed to estimate Pecking-Order and Static Trade-offmodels. Our results show that although neither Pecking Order nor Static Trade-offTheory seems to apply to non-family firms, family firms are more likely to adopt an indebtedness target ratio. Moreover, the introduction of an allowance for corporate equity on the Belgian market is also taken into account. Our results indicate that such a mechanism seems to have an influence on the family firms funding choices. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bauweraerts, J., & Colot, O. (2012). Pecking-Order or Static Trade-off Theory in Family Firms? Evidence from Belgium. International Business Research, 5(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n11p1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free