Feasibility Study Using Propensity Score Matching Methods for the Pseudo-Common Person Equating Requirement

1Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We tested if a propensity score (PS) matching method supports the unidimensionality assumption of the Rasch model which is critical to link similar rehabilitation instruments. We obtained 1,013 respondents from the 2009 Hispanic Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly Frailty study. We used a unidimensional item pool of 10 SF-36 physical function and nine activities of daily living items. Subjects were matched based on their functionality (high and low), and exploratory factor analysis was used to test if the item pool in the matched sample holds the unidimensionality assumption. The study findings revealed that the matched sample demonstrated two distinct measurement structures with excellent model fit. This finding indicates that the PS matching did not mimic the common-person assumption. Therefore, the combination of PS matching and common-person equating method may not be appropriate to equate two rehabilitation-related instruments administered to two different groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hong, I., Hay, C. C., & Reistetter, T. A. (2019). Feasibility Study Using Propensity Score Matching Methods for the Pseudo-Common Person Equating Requirement. OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health, 39(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449218778535

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free