Density, extractives and decay resistance variabilities within branch wood from four agroforestry hardwood species

11Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Agroforestry practices like pruning trees to control the light flux to crops produce every year a large volume of branches which is valorized by farmers as mulching or energy fuel. However, according to the literature, the wood of branches shows higher rates of polyphenols than stem wood and this can open some new perspectives for branch exploitation. In this study, the wood properties (density, mechanical properties, extractive content and decay resistance) were determined on branches of different sizes from oak, chestnut, poplar and walnut trees collected in two agroforestry systems. These properties were evaluated according to the wood age and the sampling position along the radial and longitudinal axes of the branch. All samples were analyzed by NIR-Spectroscopy and a predicting model aimed to assess the branch wood properties has been developed. Wood characteristics largely vary between species and do not exactly follow the same trends from one species to another. Overall, hard-wood density of branches is similar to that of trunks, the content in wood extractives follows similar evolutions, and the decay resistance of branch wood does not seem to be really impacted by its position along the branch. Reliable NIRS models were built to easily predict the wood density and extractives content of agroforestry branches. The extractives content and the decay resistance of branch hardwood appear to be substantially lower than those of trunks, which suggests a non-suitability of branch wood for developing highvalued green chemistry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Terrasse, F., Brancheriau, L., Marchal, R., Boutahar, N., Lotte, S., Guibal, D., … Candelier, K. (2021). Density, extractives and decay resistance variabilities within branch wood from four agroforestry hardwood species. IForest, 14(3), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3693-014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free