Do Perceptions of Costs and Benefits of Post-secondary Education Influence Participation?

  • Côté J
  • Skinkle R
  • Motte A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite the continuing accumulation of knowledge of the factors in- fluencing participation in post-secondary education, there are still gaps in our understanding. For example, very little is known regarding how perceptions of costs and benefits are implicated in an individual’s decision to pursue college or university studies, and whether certain perceptions hamper access among students from disadvantaged backgrounds. This paper presents results from a research programme designed to develop and evaluate an operationalization of “perceived return on investment” (PRoI) in post-secondary education, based on students’ subjective considerations of costs and benefits. These results are derived from two key research questions: is it possible to reliably measure high school students’ perceived return on investment in a post-secondary education, and does the measurement of these perceptions predict actual post-secondary participation? Results show that PRoI can be measured satisfactorily and is predictive of university attendance, net of other factors currently known to influence participation. The “perceptual horizon effect” model is proposed to account for both positive and negative perceptions of returns on investment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Côté, J., Skinkle, R., & Motte, A. (1969). Do Perceptions of Costs and Benefits of Post-secondary Education Influence Participation? Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 38(2), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v38i2.510

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free