Comparisons of fast repetition rate fluorescence estimated primary production and 14C uptake by phytoplankton

44Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Comparisons of primary productivity measured by 14C uptake and fast repetition rate fluorescence (FRRF) for samples taken from Massachusetts Bay and Narragansett Bay demonstrated a linear relationship between the 2 techniques. The slope of the regression for different phytoplankton samples ranged between 0.23 and 1.04, with most between 0.4 and 0. The r2 was usually high and >0.9 in the best cases. The results indicated that the FRRF usually underestimated primary productivity relative to 14C. The variability in the relationship between 14C uptake and the FRRF productivity estimates indicates that FRRF field measurements should be calibrated against other productivity measurement techniques such as 14C uptake or oxygen production if they are to be compared to historical productivity estimates. The Kolber & Falkowski (1993; Limnol Oceanogr 38:1646-1665) and the Smyth et al. (2004; J Plankton Res 19:1637-1670) models for estimating productivity by variable fluorescence were compared, and agreed very well with an r2 of 0.99 for the linear relationship between the 2 techniques. © Inter-Research 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Melrose, D. C., Oviatt, C. A., O’Reilly, J. E., & Berman, M. S. (2006). Comparisons of fast repetition rate fluorescence estimated primary production and 14C uptake by phytoplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 311, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps311037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free