Reduced surgical success rate of rectus muscle plication compared to resection

29Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the surgical success of rectus muscle plication compared to resection and to compare the short- and long-term changes in ocular alignment after both procedures. Methods The medical records of all patients who underwent a rectus muscle tightening procedure (resection or plication) at a single institution over a 5-year period by a single surgeon were reviewed retrospectively. Binocular alignment was recorded before and immediately after surgery and again at 6-12 weeks and final follow-up visit. Primary outcome was surgical success rate, defined as distance alignment of ≤10Δ for horizontal and ≤6Δ for vertical strabismus. Secondary outcomes were reoperation rate and postoperative alignment drift. Results A total of 72 surgeries were identified for inclusion: 48 resections and 24 plications. Surgical success was significantly higher in the resection group than in the plication group (89% vs 58%; P = 0.005) at both 6-12 weeks’ follow-up (P = 0.005) and at mean final follow-up of 19 ± 13 months (range, 3-56 months [n = 48]; P = 0.03). Reoperations were performed in 3 patients in the plication group (12.5%), all for undercorrection; there were no reoperations in the resection group (P = 0.03). Conclusions Rectus muscle plication has many potential advantages over resection, including sparing of the ciliary circulation. In our experience, however, patients treated with plication had lower surgical success rates and a higher reoperation rate. Surgeons should monitor their long-term results before considering plication as their procedure of choice over resection. [Figure presented]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alkharashi, M., & Hunter, D. G. (2017). Reduced surgical success rate of rectus muscle plication compared to resection. In Journal of AAPOS (Vol. 21, pp. 201–204). Mosby Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.05.012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free