Effect of flip angle for optimization of image quality of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced biliary imaging at 1.5 T

28Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to perform a qualitative and quantitative comparison of image quality of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced imaging of the biliary system acquired using different flip angles (FAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-two patients (21 men and 11 women; mean [± SD] age, 51 ± 16 years) who underwent gadoxetate disodium-enhanced 1.5-T MRI were included. A 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence was acquired during the hepatobiliary phase using FAs of 12°, 25°, and 40°. One radiologist, who was blinded to FA, measured signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the biliary tree. Two other blinded radiologists assessed subjective biliary duct clarity, overall image quality, background signal suppression, and ghosting artifact from the biliary tree using a scale of 1 to 4. RESULTS. SNRs and CNRs of the common bile duct were significantly higher for FAs of 25° (227.5 ± 113.2 and 191.0 ± 102.2, respectively) and 40° (239.6 ± 118.7 and 201.7 ± 107.7, respectively) than for 12° (168.9 ± 73.9 and 126.7 ± 59.7, respectively; all p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in SNR or CNR between FAs of 25° and 40° (p ≥ 0.360). Clarity of first-, second-, and third-order intrahepatic ducts, background signal suppression, and overall image quality were significantly higher for both readers for FAs of 25° and 40° than for 12° (all p ≤ 0.031). None of these comparisons was significantly different for either reader between FAs 25° and 40° (all p ≥ 0.091), aside from improved depiction of third-order ducts at 40° for one reader ( p = 0.030). Biliary ghosting artifact was significantly worse at 40° than at 12° for both readers ( p ≤ 0.016). CONCLUSION. The use of an FA larger than the clinical standard of approximately 12°has the potential to improve the image quality of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced biliary imaging. © American Roentgen Ray Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, S., Mussi, T. C., Lee, L. J., Mausner, E. V., Cho, K. C., & Rosenkrantz, A. B. (2013). Effect of flip angle for optimization of image quality of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced biliary imaging at 1.5 T. American Journal of Roentgenology, 200(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.8722

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free